• Google translate:  
Increase Font Sizesmallerreset
Home arrow New Age Cults and Isms arrow John Roger and MSIA

John Roger and MSIA

Article Index
John Roger and MSIA
Legitimacy versus Authenticity
A Brief History of M.S.I.A.
J.R. is a Plagiarist
Paul Twitchell
John-Roger
Florence Scovel Shinn (1925)
John Roger Hinkins (1981) [Affirmations]
J.R. Sexually Manipulates His Disciples
J.R. is a Charlatan
The Traditional Analysis
The Humanistic and Transpersonal Critique
The Red Monk Disease
Postscript
Notes

J.R. Sexually Manipulates His Disciples

Perhaps the most shocking thing to be alleged about John-Roger by a number of M.S.I.A. members is that he sexually manipulates his disciples into having a homosexual affair, claiming that it is for their best spiritual interests. According to several reports, J.R. has apparently been using his spiritual title in order to have sexual relationships with numerous male disciples.

In this regard, Roger joins the growing ranks of gurus who have crossed the ethical borderline between religious guidance and physical intimacy. This infamous assemblage now includes the likes of Swami Muktananda, who according to William Rodarmor's article in CoEvolution Quarterly (Winter 1983), was having numerable sexual encounters with his female followers both in America and India before his death in 1982; Neem Karoli Baba, Richard Alpert's teacher, who is recorded to have had "making out" sessions with some of his female American devotees; and Sathya Sai Baba, perhaps India's most famous mystic, who is described by Tal Brooke (one-time disciple) in Lord of the Air (1979) to be a practicing homosexual.

As sexuality is undoubtedly a personal matter and perhaps a skeleton in most individual's closets, it is not my wish to elaborate any further on this private issue which has turned public within the last decade. However, it should be pointed out that spiritual teachers by necessity must be judged by a high moral standard, for they are allowing themselves to be examples of what other humans can and should be. Though, indeed, gurus are human like the rest of us (and deserve our understanding and forgiveness), they represent a higher potential, a supposed enlightened state. Hence, when one does "fall off the pedestal" it should Inot be ignored or condoned with lame excuses. To do so only allows for more ethical transgressions to occur. Gurus don't hesitate to point out their devotee's weaknesses, nor should disciples be hesitant in criticizing their teacher's faults. Critical exchange is crucial and healthy for any type of relationship--including teacher/students ones.



 
We have had 2,456,043 visitors since Thursday 27 July 2006.